International
01 Jun, 2026
PM Shah’s ‘Nepal encroaching Indian land’ refers to cross-border occupation: Nepal FO
Business To Business, Kathmandu, 1st June, 2026: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Nepal on Sunday clarified that remarks made by Balendra Shah regarding Nepal "encroaching" on Indian territory were being interpreted out of context and were related to issues involving no-man's land and cross-border occupation along the frontier between the two countries.
Background
Earlier in the day, Shah told Parliament that he had learned about instances of Nepal "encroaching" on territory in India while responding to questions on the long-running border dispute between Nepal and India.
His comments generated controversy because the border dispute is typically framed around competing territorial claims, particularly in the areas of:
- Kalapani
- Lipulekh
- Limpiyadhura
Both countries claim these areas, while India maintains that they are part of the state of Uttarakhand.
Foreign Ministry clarification
The Foreign Ministry stated that Shah's remarks referred to:
- Encroachments and occupation issues occurring in no-man's land areas along the border.
- Cross-border land-use concerns affecting both sides.
- Practical boundary-management issues rather than a change in Nepal's official position on the territorial dispute.
The clarification sought to explain that the Prime Minister was not conceding Nepal's claims in the disputed regions.
Ongoing discussions with India
Shah also informed Parliament that:
- Nepal has sent a diplomatic note to India regarding boundary concerns.
- New Delhi has responded to the communication.
- Both sides have agreed to involve historians, surveyors and technical experts in efforts to resolve outstanding disputes.
- Kathmandu has discussed aspects of the issue with China and the United Kingdom as part of its broader diplomatic engagement.
India-Nepal border issue
The boundary dispute between India and Nepal has persisted for decades and intensified in 2020 following the publication of competing official maps by the two countries.
India's position remains that the matter should be resolved through bilateral dialogue and established diplomatic mechanisms. Both countries have generally sought to manage the dispute while maintaining their broader political, economic and cultural relationship.